<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Master Class: Part 2 in 60 Seconds or Less</title>
	<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/</link>
	<description>Demystifying Sustainable Success</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Study Hacks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monday Master Class: The 5 Most Useful Study Hacks Articles That You Never Read</title>
		<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-8162</link>
		<author>Study Hacks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monday Master Class: The 5 Most Useful Study Hacks Articles That You Never Read</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-8162</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2 in 60 Seconds or Less Fans of Straight-A know that Part 2 covers quizzes and tests. Much of the advice from this section has made it onto this blog (quiz and recall, question/evidence/conclusion, mega problem sets&#8230;) The information, however, can be overwhelming. In response to this concern, I wrote this article, which breaks out the main ideas motivating those crucial chapters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Part 2 in 60 Seconds or Less Fans of Straight-A know that Part 2 covers quizzes and tests. Much of the advice from this section has made it onto this blog (quiz and recall, question/evidence/conclusion, mega problem sets&#8230;) The information, however, can be overwhelming. In response to this concern, I wrote this article, which breaks out the main ideas motivating those crucial chapters. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-6615</link>
		<author>Carl</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-6615</guid>
		<description>What subjects can Q/E/C note taking be used for. I'll be taking Religious Studies, Geography, Economics and Biology next year, which of these would you recommend/not recommend using this technique with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What subjects can Q/E/C note taking be used for. I&#8217;ll be taking Religious Studies, Geography, Economics and Biology next year, which of these would you recommend/not recommend using this technique with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study Hacks</title>
		<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-6065</link>
		<author>Study Hacks</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-6065</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Regarding the advice that one shouldn’t record raw information, would it be okay to record raw information in class, but then go back and make new notes, this time with the processed information?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There's nothing wrong with it, it's just slow. From my experience, it takes a lot of will power to actually go back through and spend a lot of time on each lecture's notes, after the fact. The more processing you do in class -- where you have to be anyway -- the easier studying becomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Regarding the advice that one shouldn’t record raw information, would it be okay to record raw information in class, but then go back and make new notes, this time with the processed information?</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with it, it&#8217;s just slow. From my experience, it takes a lot of will power to actually go back through and spend a lot of time on each lecture&#8217;s notes, after the fact. The more processing you do in class &#8212; where you have to be anyway &#8212; the easier studying becomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-6058</link>
		<author>Lee</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/07/20/monday-master-class-part-2-in-60-seconds-or-less/#comment-6058</guid>
		<description>Regarding the advice that one shouldn't record raw information, would it be okay to record raw information in class, but then go back and make new notes, this time with the processed information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the advice that one shouldn&#8217;t record raw information, would it be okay to record raw information in class, but then go back and make new notes, this time with the processed information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
