<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Science of Studying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/08/28/the-science-of-studying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/08/28/the-science-of-studying/</link>
	<description>Demystifying Sustainable Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:12:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weiss - Devin</title>
		<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/08/28/the-science-of-studying/#comment-13306</link>
		<dc:creator>Weiss - Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calnewport.com/blog/?p=47#comment-13306</guid>
		<description>Science is such a complicated subject, at times, a field with plenty of ego at stake. Which is clear. There have even been bouts of &quot;outsiderness&quot; in the scientific community (molecular biology vs. ecology, or mathematics vs. physics), and degrees of dogma rising above scientific acumen are too numerous (even once is too much as within the &quot;Clovis first&quot; mandate). Skepticism has long served science well, it also might be time for a new paradigm -- a subtle, yet powerful shift in mindset and thinking. Could &quot;selfless restraint&quot; fill that duty? It offers all the right elements minus the excess baggage that all too frequently goes with skepticism. One glance at the &quot;skeptics&quot; forums and online resources, and it is possible to see the kind of illogics that once in a while discover their way into scientific thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science is such a complicated subject, at times, a field with plenty of ego at stake. Which is clear. There have even been bouts of &#8220;outsiderness&#8221; in the scientific community (molecular biology vs. ecology, or mathematics vs. physics), and degrees of dogma rising above scientific acumen are too numerous (even once is too much as within the &#8220;Clovis first&#8221; mandate). Skepticism has long served science well, it also might be time for a new paradigm &#8212; a subtle, yet powerful shift in mindset and thinking. Could &#8220;selfless restraint&#8221; fill that duty? It offers all the right elements minus the excess baggage that all too frequently goes with skepticism. One glance at the &#8220;skeptics&#8221; forums and online resources, and it is possible to see the kind of illogics that once in a while discover their way into scientific thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study Hacks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Around the Web: Clive Thompson Tackles the Science of Studying</title>
		<link>http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/08/28/the-science-of-studying/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Study Hacks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Around the Web: Clive Thompson Tackles the Science of Studying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calnewport.com/blog/?p=47#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] couple weeks back I reported on a new scientific study on studying. One of my writing idols, Clive Thompson, recently weighed in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] couple weeks back I reported on a new scientific study on studying. One of my writing idols, Clive Thompson, recently weighed in [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
