Dangerous Ideas: Productivity is Overrated
Features: Mythbusting August 31st. 2007, 3:10pmI’m introducing a new semi-regular feature: Dangerous Ideas. Each entry in the series will focus on a provocative idea, built out of anecdotal evidence, that challenges a piece of conventional wisdom.
Today’s dangerous idea: Productivity is Overrated
I should be careful here. Much of my livelihood as a writer depends on my good-natured efforts to help fellow students be more productive. So I should clarify…
Productivity is important for being successful. But its role in this endeavor is often blown out of proportion. Some of the most accomplished people I know are incredibly disorganized. They work at the last minute. They stay up all night. They constantly scramble to find what they’re looking for. But they still get it done. Other accomplished people are incredibly organized. What gives? The truths underlying this reality:
- Being productive does not make you accomplished.
- It does, however, make being accomplished less stressful.
The key to really getting ahead has nothing to do with productivity. From my experience with successful young people (and, as I writer, I have quite a bit of exposure to this crowd) what you need, put simply, is a drive to keep working, with a laser-like intensity, on something even after you’ve lost immediate interest. Tenacity. A grating thirst to get it done. These are the precursors of accomplishment.
Having good productivity habits compliment this crucial skill. They take this intensity and place it in a schedule. They keep small things from crowding your mind. They eliminate the stress of what appointment you might be forgetting or what vital errand has to be done. But productivity is not a substitute for this work.
This is a mistake I sometimes intuit is being made by young people with an interest in this community. There is a belief that if you get just the right system, with just the right calendar technology, and to-do notebook, and task management philosophy, accomplishment will come automatically. You can just turn the system on and watch it churn out what needs to get done.
Alas, this never happens. It’s like the first law of accomplishment thermodynamics: accomplishment can’t spring from nothingness. At some point, even David Allen himself still has to convince himself to do hard things when he doesn’t want to. Effort must be expended. This cannot be avoided.
Within the scope of this reality, productivity plays a crucial role. If you want to get ahead in a meaningful, low-stress, controlled manner you have to pay attention to these little habits. Take college students for example. It’s possible to do really well without all of the philosophies I pitch. This is what grinds do. They want those grades, and they dig in and make it happen. But their lives are pretty brutal. With the right productivity habits, the same goal can be accomplished in a less stressful, more reasonable manner. Along the way, however, you still have to convince yourself to get up, get to library, and open that book, no matter how clearly it’s recorded on your calendar.
It’s important to make this distinction because it helps you prepare. If you acknowledge the role of hard work, you can adjust your mindset to be one that expects and values this trait. This is what, in the end, will make the biggest difference in what you end up getting done — regardless of how you organize, break down, and schedule this work.




August 31st, 2007 at 8:04 pm
coupla things. productivity overrated–agreed. tenacity? probably making too much of this. you still need to be able to sometimes just say wtf and do what you want. hard work is really much more than it’s made out to be. i’ve been a big fan of the 4-hour workweek, and it’s done wonders for my earning power, social life, and overall outlook on life.
August 31st, 2007 at 8:23 pm
You’re right. No one needs to be working hard all the time. I guess the myth I want to dispell is that *if* you have some big, audacious goals in life, you can’t rely only on a bunch of productivity tips to do the work for you. I know too many people who delay starting something they want to do while they wait to find that perfect to-do software.
September 1st, 2007 at 10:15 pm
[...] Newport has posted a very insightful post recently titled Productivity is Overrated. While many people will argue against this idea, Cal does have some interesting [...]
October 18th, 2007 at 3:20 pm
[...] August, I published an essay on my blog, Study Hacks, that was titled: Productivity is Overrated. The basic idea: productivity systems, like Getting Things Done, reduce stress and help you keep [...]
October 18th, 2007 at 7:14 pm
One of the biggest problems (esp. my biggest problem) is what you call (and I love this term, because it’s so precise) pseudo-work.
You can apply all these techniques, being organized like hell, but if you actually don’t really work and only sit it out (as I am a professional in).
October 19th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
[...] Cal Newport’s point is that productivity can keep you busy with endless todo lists filled with infinitesimally small next actions. You’ll never run out of things to do. But do you actually finish any of your projects this way? [...]
October 24th, 2007 at 7:00 am
[...] I didn’t realize though is that productivity is overrated. It’s not the goal but the means to an end. And so are all the other things that we do that [...]
November 8th, 2007 at 9:47 pm
[...] few months back, I published an essay titled: Productivity is Overrated. The message was simple. Being organized reduces stress, but it does not, by itself, guarantee that [...]
April 18th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
[...] Productivity is Overrated [...]
April 25th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
[...] use Study Hacks parlance, Marty is a finisher. He doesn’t just tackle projects that pique his interest, but he also manages that [...]
March 1st, 2009 at 8:37 pm
[...] Dangerous Ideas: Productivity is Overrated [...]