Archive for the 'Links' Category

Weekend Links: Ogle Planners, Drink Your Way to Health, and Dissect Your Life

Links No Comments »

Interesting links from around the web to help you through your weekend Study Hacks withdrawal…

A Copious Cornucopia of Productivity-Themed Contraptions

Weekend Links: Don’t Sweat the Bad Stuff, Take Notes Like Edison, and Applaud David Seah’s Certainty…

Links No Comments »

Interesting links from around the web to help you through your weekend Study Hacks withdrawal…

An Extravaganza of Productivity-Infused Detritus

Weekend Links: Stop Working on Fridays, Meet Better People, and Become Perplexed by Cal’s Prolificness

Links 4 Comments »

Interesting links from around the web to help you through your weekend Study Hacks withdrawal.

Assorted Productivity Gems

Cal Gets Inexplicably Prolific

Around the Web: Can You Train Your Brain? (Answer: Yes)

Links No Comments »

The Sharp Brains blog has a fascinating post about the trainability of your brain. There was once a time when scientists thought that brain function was really only able to move one direction: inexorably downward as we age. Recent evidence shows this not to be the case. We have more control than we think.

Sharp Minds :: 11 Neuroscientists Debunk a Common Myth about Brain Training

What’s great about this post is that it pulls quotes from original interviews with 11 top neuroscientists — with links to the full interview notes also included.

Some choice sound bites:

“Learning is physical. Learning means the modification, growth, and pruning of our neurons, connections–called synapses– and neuronal networks, through experience…When we do so, we are cultivating our own neuronal networks.”

“Exercising our brains systematically is as important as exercising our bodies. In my experience, ‘Use it or lose it’ should really be ‘Use it and get more of it’”

“Individuals who lead mentally stimulating lives, through education, occupation and leisure activities, have reduced risk of developing Alzheimer’s symptoms.”

(hat tip: a blog around the clock)

How Unfair is the College Admission Process?

Links 6 Comments »

There’s an interesting op-ed in the New York Times today:

The New York Times | The New College Try

Professor Jerome Karabel argues that selective college admissions is far from meritocratic. Indeed, he notes:

Just how skewed the system is toward the already advantaged is illustrated by the findings of a recent study of 146 selective colleges and universities, which concluded that students from the top quartile of the socioeconomic hierarchy (based on parental income, education and occupation) are 25 times more likely to attend a “top tier” college than students from the bottom quartile. [emphasis mine]

Why does this happen? Karabel notes that the SATs play a big role. The current definition of “merit” in the admissions process draws heavily on SAT scores, and these scores tend to correlate strongly with socioeconomic status:

Of all students nationwide who score more than 1300 on the SAT, two-thirds come from the top socioeconomic quartile and just 3 percent from the bottom quartile.

The situation is distressing. As Karabel notes:

Only a vigorous policy of class-based affirmative action that accounts for the huge class differences in educational opportunity has a chance of altering this pattern.

This sounds right. But it’s not very encouraging. What are the chances that our current congress will be engaging in “vigorous” social policy any time soon?

The Relative “Fairness” of College Admissions

College admissions is something I’ve thought a lot about. It’s a difficult issue. I think too often people are quick to either fully embrace or dismiss entirely the process. My current thoughts tend more toward additional distinction.

For example, it’s easy to claim that college admission unfairly rewards the rich because they can afford SAT prep and fancy college counselors. Maybe. My exposure to admission offices, however, seems to emphasize that SAT prep doesn’t do any more good than just taking a few timed sample tests on your own (which is free), and the efforts of college counselors are easily sniffed out on most applications (and tend to annoy admission officers).

In other words, college admissions may turn out to be more fair than we think when it comes to choosing between students from the middle class and those from the upper class. On the other hand, as revealed in today’s op-ed, the process may also turn out to be more unfair than we think when it comes to choosing between the lower class and those above.

Maybe the key is not to confuse the two? Another subtlety in a complicated issue…

Around the Web: 7 Ways to Get to Sleep

Links 1 Comment »

A good post by Martin over at the UK-centric University Blog provides a nice compliment to our recent discussion of sleep:

University Blog :: 7 tips to top sleep, 3 tips for staying awake

He provides seven tips for getting to sleep when your body resists. I won’t give away the whole thing, but here’s a taste:

Don’t keep studying/writing/working until the last minute before bed - The more mental gymnastics you do before bed, the less likely you’re going to drop off to sleep quickly. Give yourself a few moments peace just before shutdown…

Of course, there’s always just Nyquil…

Around the Web: Introducing Dissertation Bootcamp

Links No Comments »

Considering graduate school? Wondering what it’s really like? I recommend the following blog:

Dissertation Bootcamp

The DB blog features a group of grad student contributors who gripe, celebrate, and mope their way through the ups and downs of the PhD hunt. Provides an insightful picture of the reality of grad student life. Trust me. I’m living it…

Around the Web: The Return of The Genius in All of Us

Links No Comments »

One of my favorite blogs is The Genius in All of Us. Written by author David Shenk, it accompanies the research process for an upcoming book that will chronicle: “How science is unveiling a rich new understanding of talent, giftedness, and brilliance.”

The topic is relevant to this blog. One of the biggest obstacles to revamping your study habits is overcoming the mistaken belief that you are simply not “smart” enough to score top grades.

Anyway, after a long break, David has returned to blogging by way of a new post on how the media often misreports the connection between genes and I.Q.:

David Brooks Gets Intelligence Right — But Genetics Wrong

The money quote:

What statistical studies like Devlin’s miss is that genes actually do not pass any complex traits down on their own. The expression and regulation of genes, biologists now understand, is entirely dependent on their interaction with the environment. You cannot separate one from the other. There is no “nature vs. nurture.”

Check him out…