Fixed-Schedule Productivity: How I Accomplish a Large Amount of Work in a Small Number of Work Hours
Tips: Time Management, Scheduling, & Productivity February 15th. 2008, 2:59pmMy Schedule Should Be Terrible…
I should have an overwhelming, Malox-guzzling, stress-saturated schedule. Here’s why: I’m a graduate student in a demanding program. I’m working on several research papers while also attempting to nail down some key ideas for my dissertation. I’m TA’ing and taking courses. I maintain this blog. I’m a staff writer for Flak Magazine. And to keep things interesting, I’m working on background research for a potential new book project.
You would be reasonable to assume that I must get, on average, 7 - 8 minutes of sleep a night. But you would also be wrong. Let me explain…
For Some Reason It’s Not…
Here is my actual schedule. I work:
- From 9 to 5 on weekdays.
- In the morning on Sunday.
That’s it. Unless I’m bored, I have no need to even turn on a computer after 5 during the week or any time on Saturday. I fill these times, instead, doing, well, whatever I want.
How do I balance an ambitious work load with an ambitiously sparse schedule? It’s a simple idea I call fixed-schedule productivity.
Fixed-Schedule Productivity
The system work as follows:
- Choose a schedule of work hours that you think provides the ideal balance of effort and relaxation.
- Do whatever it takes to avoid violating this schedule.
This sounds simple. But think about it for a moment. Satisfying rule 2 is not easy. If you took your current projects, obligations, and work habits, you’d probably fall well short of satisfying your ideal work schedule. Here’s a simple truth: to stick to your ideal schedule will require some drastic actions. For example, you may have to:
- Dramatically cut back on the number of projects you are working on.
- Ruthlessly cull inefficient habits from your daily schedule.
- Risk mildly annoying or upsetting some people in exchange for large gains in time freedom.
- Stop procrastinating.
In the abstract, these all seem like hard things to do. But when you have the focus of a specific goal — “I do not want to work past 5 on week days!” — you’d be surprised by how much easier it becomes deploy these strategies in your daily life.
Let’s look at an example…
Case Study: My Schedule
My schedule provides a good case study. To reach my relatively small work hour limit, I have to be careful with how I go about my day. I see enough bleary-eyed insomniacs around here to know how easy it is to slip into a noon to 3 am routine (the infamous “MIT cycle.”) Here are some of the techniques I regularly use to remain within the confines of my fixed schedule:
- I serialize my projects. I keep two project queues — one from my student projects and one for my writing projects. At any one moment I’m only working on the top project from each queue. When I finish, I move on to the next. This focus lets me churn out quality results without the wasted time of constantly dancing back and forth between multiple efforts. (As also discussed here and here.)
- I’m ultra-clear about when to expect results from me. And it’s not always soon. If someone slips something onto my queue, I make an honest evaluation of when it will percolate to the top. I communicate this date. Then I make it happen when the time comes. You can get away with telling people to expect a result a long time in the future, if — and this is a big if — you actually deliver when promised.
- I refuse. If my queue is too crowded for a potential project to get done in time, I turn it down.
- I drop projects and quit. If a project gets out of control, and starts to sap too much time from my schedule: I drop it. If something demonstrably more important comes along, and it conflicts with something else in my queue, I drop the less important project. If an obligation is taking up too much time: I quit. Here’s a secret: no one really cares what you do on the small scale. In the end you’re judged on your large-scale list of important completions.
- I’m not available. I often work in hidden nooks of the various libraries on campus. I check and respond to work e-mail only a few times a day. People have to wait for responses from me. It’s often hard to find me. Sometimes they get upset at first. But they don’t really need immediate access. And I will always respond within a reasonable timeframe and get them what they need. So they adjust. And I get things done.
- I batch and habitatize. Any regularly occurring work gets turned into a habit — something I do at a fixed time on a fixed date. For example, I write blog posts on Sunday morning. I do reading for my seminar on Friday and Monday mornings. Etc. Habit-based schedules for the regular work makes it easier to tackle the non-regular projects. It also prevents schedule-busting pile-ups.
- I start early. Sometimes real early. On certain projects that I know are important, I don’t tolerate procrastination. It doesn’t interest me. If I need to start something 2 or 3 weeks in advance so that my queue proceeds as needed, I do so.
Why This Works
You could fill any arbitrary number of hours with what feels to be productive work. Between e-mail, and “crucial” web surfing, and to-do lists that, in the age of David Allen, grow to lengths that rival the bible, there is always something you could be doing. At some point, however, you have to put a stake in the ground and say: I know I have a never-ending stream of work, but this is when I’m going to face it. If you don’t do this, you let the never-ending stream of work push you around like a bully. It will force you into tiring, inefficient schedules. And you’ll end up more stressed and no more accomplished.
Fix the schedule you want. Then make everything else fit around your needs. Be flexible. Be efficient. If you can’t make it fit: change your work. But in the end, don’t compromise. No one really cares about your schedule except for yourself. So make it right.

February 15th, 2008 at 6:15 pm
That is awesome advice. Hats off to you for instilling such discipline in your work
but as always its predicated by the desire to set out and accomplish a goal - something that is often missing.
February 15th, 2008 at 7:28 pm
That’s really cool. I’m excited to find parallels between your workflow habits and my own. I’ll definitely be trying some of the ones you mentioned that I’m missing. Good post!
February 16th, 2008 at 12:35 am
Hmmm… I take case with two things:
1) I know that it behooves most people to be flexible enough to drop everything and seize an opportunity. Being “not available” during significant chunks of the day won’t permit that flexibility. I’ve gotten valuable freelance jobs that teetered on replying to an email less than an hour after getting the first. I’ve come up with ingenious ideas when a friend burst into my room to strike up a random conversation.
2. If you’re working your butt off 9-5 during the week, how do you schedule meetings with people?
February 16th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Cal, what is your new book project? Will it be your third book about study hacks? I bet so many of us are interested.
February 16th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
@Chris:
This is actually a really interesting question. Reflecting on my own schedule, I realize that I too frequently drop everything to go after a sudden idea or make a random pitch. The best way I can explain it is that my stripped down schedule allows more flexibility than if I was constantly up to my ears in tons of little things that had to get done right away. It’s definitely interesting, however, to think through these facets…
@Vincent:
I’m still keeping it under wraps for now, because I’m not sure yet if I’m ready to commit to the idea. But I can tell you this, it is not an explicit how to book, but more general non-fiction. It does involve college, but, to use Study Hacks categories, it is more from the “Deconstructing Success” arena than the “Study Tips” or “Student Productivity” arena.
Stay tuned…
February 16th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Great post. This is exactly what is advocated by Neil Fiore and I’ve been thinking about the viability of working this 40-45 hour a week schedule as a grad student in a research intensive, competitive environment. The one thing that makes me second guess whether I can get enough done with those hours is seeing people like my adviser who work 60+ hours and do produce things to show for it. You don’t find folks at MIT, students or professors, that work insane hours and do have the output to show for it? Did you run into any “super successful” folks in your book research that also worked more than 50 hours a week?
Regardless, this post convinces me that it is possible to be, I should you use the word effective, in terms of output, with those hours. Thanks for that!
February 16th, 2008 at 9:38 pm
The truth is, people are too demanding of others time anyways. Unless it’s a serious emergency, I don’t let anyone disrupt me while its my study time. I often do the same (after reading your straight-A book)… hiding in secret nooks in the library and finding study places where it isn’t easy to find me. Unfortunately for my boyfriend, if he doesn’t answer his cell phone at any given time in the day, his parents and sister practically file a missing persons report. Literally they start calling me and all his friends as well to try and find him. I wish he had the gonads to just shut off his phone, instead of catering.
February 17th, 2008 at 5:09 pm
@Gradhacker;
A lot of really successful people work a lot of hours. I discussed this once in an earlier post. The basic idea is that productivity makes you more organized, work less hours, and be less stressed. But it is more or less independent from being successful, which is more a function of being able to focus on things and get them done. That is, it doesn’t matter, in terms of raw accomplishment, if you consistently finish things in all-nighters or in nice, spread out, GTD style chunks. The latter, however, is a lot easier on your sanity.
I should add the disclaimer that I am in theory — my research involves solving math proofs. So I am spared most of the unavoidable time sinks of other sciences; e.g., debugging code, running lab equipment, massaging data sets or other activities that can suck up a huge number of hours regardless of how efficient you are.
February 17th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
@Robyn:
You should point your boyfriend to Merlin Mann’s most recent talk. His premise is that the key to dealing with modern lifestyle is controlling who gets your attention and when.
The video is here.
February 17th, 2008 at 10:36 pm
Cal:
So successful folks are obsessed with completion. Did you find the inverse to be true? That the reason some people aren’t as successful in terms of impactive output was that they simply do not finish what they start on a regular basis?
If so, this leads to a simple remedy: Once you decide something is worth doing, finish it. Period. (Barring a significant reason to change priorities).
February 18th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Hi Mr. Newport,
Your book is amazing!!! I absolutely love it. I realize your extremely busy but don’t EVER stop writing this blog, it rules dude!!!
Taker easy,
Sunny
February 18th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
@Gradhacker:
Let me throw in an extra wrinkle. Just as important as the completion obsession is a finely-tuned filter that lets them know what’s worth completing and what’s worth chucking. I know other people, who finish a lot of things, but the things they finish aren’t helping them. (Think: the blogger who perfects stats and ad placements instead of pushing throw better articles.)
The filter is tough. I’m still trying to figure that one out…though I have some ideas. (As you can tell, this is a topic I’m fascinated by.)
@Sunny:
Thanks! I’ll keep at it…
February 20th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
hi cal,
great post, great blog - i’m implementing lots of your ideas and having success with them. I’m curious about how you serialize your projects - i am also a phd student in a very demanding humanities program (and have a 17 month old, which is a whole different wrinkle!) and am currently writing articles, studying for exams, and reading/thinking about dissertation stuff. I’m not sure how to queue things in this kind of situation - i mean, if i put one article at the top of the list, it might be 2 months before that gets totally done. does that mean everything else has to fall by the wayside till then?
i’d love to see a post on how you manage the serialization!
thanks,
heath
February 20th, 2008 at 2:52 pm
@Heath:
Good question. I think that would make for a good post. The short answer is that I’m serializing chunks of bigger projects; not the full projects themselves. For example, the top of my current student project queue looks as follows:
[ ] complete requested minor revisions on journal article
[ ] construct brainstorm document for new idea I’m working on
[ ] do literature search on topic X
[ ] review conference paper
And so on…
February 21st, 2008 at 1:10 am
Just wanted to make sure, so from 9 to 5 on week days, Saturdays no work, and in the morning on Sundays with your ritual. So do these work hours include going to class, doing homework and research since your are a grad student? or just doing work? I’m an undergrad right now, first year, so I’m not really sure if grad students have many classes to attend. And if so, then in perspective undergrad shouldn’t be too difficult as long as one stays on top of things even if it’s engineering.
February 21st, 2008 at 2:30 am
@Kabir:
As a 4th year grad student I’m not attending a lot of classes these days (taking 1, TA’ing 1) so work, while it does cover homework, really means research. For undergrads with a hard major you might have to pump up the number of work hours just because classes and labs can eat up so much time on their own; but the same philosophies hold. Choose the (reasonable) schedule first, then make it happen.
February 22nd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
[…] Fixed-Schedule Productivity - Another great entry from Cal Newport of StudyHacks. By making your work time more scarce, you will use it more efficiently. With my new book coming out, my daily schedule has been creeping into my evenings more than I’d like. I might need to implement Cal’s advice in a 30-Day Trial. […]
February 22nd, 2008 at 5:36 pm
[…] Fixed Schedule Productivity: How I Accomplish a Large Amount of Work in a Small Number of Work Hours - Study Hacks […]
February 27th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
Can you elaborate on this method a little? I’ve been adopting all sorts of methods from study hacks, but I still fill overloaded even when I’m using all my free time.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:16 am
[…] Study Hacks - Fixed-Schedule Productivity: How I Accomplish a Large Amount of Work in a Small Number… […]
April 7th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
[…] Fixed-Schedule Productivity: How I Accomplish a Large Amount of Work in a Small Number of Work Hours… […]
April 9th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
[…] Fixed-Schedule Productivity I’m a big believer in working backwards when it comes to stress and work habits: Fix the lifestyle you want, then start making the changes you need to get there (be it better life hacks or drastic simplification to your obligations). Fixed-schedule productivity is how I integrate this philosophy into my daily work schedule. […]
April 18th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
[…] Fixed-Schedule Productivity […]
May 12th, 2008 at 6:59 pm
i’m a little confused about the concept of project lists. do projects apply to regular hw assignments, papers, etc
May 12th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
@J:
Regular stuff should be capture on some sort of autopilot schedule or similar regular systems. Project lists capture the bigger, non-reoccuring tasks: a big paper; studying for a more exam.
June 21st, 2008 at 1:38 am
I love the dropping projects idea. I see so many people who take on too many things at once, and explode from it… literally. I’ve always dropped projects or new activities whenever I find that it’s too much on me, despite what others think after I do it.
June 30th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
[…] Fixed-Schedule Productivity Do you feel overwhelmed by all the work, and activities, and random crap that clogs your schedule? Read this article. The basic idea is to start with the workload you want, then ruthlessly cut, reduce, and cancel until you achieve it. Skeptical? It’s what has allowed me to work a 9 to 5, weekday-only schedule in one of the world’s most intense graduate programs. […]
August 1st, 2008 at 12:56 pm
1. I always wonder if you don’t WANT to work longer hours? I am trying constantly to downsize the rest of my life so I can put more time into my studies, because I love it so much…
2. Your 9-to-5 schedule works only for people who don’t have to work part-time, right? I work three or four times a week four hours, then attending lectures… I leave my apartment around 9 and are back at about six in the afternoon, and haven’t even started on researching and really working… How would you deal with this?
August 1st, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Right, my 9-to-5 schedule is what seemed like a good fit for my particular demands as a senior grad student — which has a small number of long-term projects and few short-term obligations. Different schedules work for different people, the key, however, is picking what would be reasonable for your situation then making it happen.
September 2nd, 2008 at 1:34 pm
[…] to productivity hacks for students. If you like this article, you might also like these posts on how as an MIT grad student I never work past 5 PM, the difference between work and pseudo-work, and the key to becoming both impressive and relaxed. […]
October 25th, 2008 at 7:05 am
[…] Fixed-Schedule Productivity: How I Accomplish a Large Amount of Work in a Small Number of Work Hour… – If you’re still struggling to get everything done, or if an hour just doesn’t seem long enough, this is a great read from Study Hacks. […]
November 6th, 2008 at 1:39 am
Thanks! i’m excited to start my own fixed schedule.
November 9th, 2008 at 4:30 am
this is just parkinson’s law you rip off.
November 28th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
I’m in my first semester of grad school (math/comp sci), and I’ve been having a horrible time. Your article is giving me hope that this can be done!
How have you dealt with clashing projects in your subconscious? For me, this has been the main headache with grad school: I’m taking three classes and teaching a fourth, and all demand subconscious seeding–to set up that thinking time in the shower that you mentioned in another article. Each class is trying to “seed” that subconscious process; three at the same time have mostly just fouled each other up. The result for me has been a thoroughly unpleasant stretch of cogitus interruptus (”noise in my head” and difficulty concentrating pretty much from waking up until falling asleep).
Do you run three or four subconscious creative processes at once, or do you mostly have just one baking at a time?
November 28th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
I follow the two-a-day rule — no more than two hard things to think about in a given day. A typical day will be working on one thing in the morning, catch-up on e-mails and lunch, then working on the second thing in the afternoon. Some days I work on just one thing. Some days I give over to lots of small stuff.
You could think of doing something similar for your classes. For example: Monday morning you seed the problem set for Class A while Monday afternoons you do serious work with your group on the problem set for Class B (which, presumably, you prepped on another day), and so on.
The bigger question, however, is why are they making you take/teach so many courses?
November 28th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
But the key difference between fixed-schedule and parkinson’s so-called “law,” is that I am saying that you have to turn down and delay things in order to stay within your fixed schedule. Parkinson’s law says that the work you do will expand to fill time. These are two different propositions.
You can read about my thoughts on parkinson’s law here:
http://calnewport.com/blog/2008/06/11/debunking-parkinsons-law/
December 5th, 2008 at 9:50 am
That is awesome advice. Hats off to you for instilling such discipline in your work but as always its predicated by the desire to set out and accomplish a goal - something that is often missing.
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:10 am
Study Hacks, Thank you. This is a very useful outline for self-directed accomplishment. It is wondrous that so much actually gets done, on campuses and in the professional world, when the prevalent philosphy continues to insist that acheivement relies on a brutal Bataan-like march, as one is bullied ever onward by hour-gobbling to-do lists and joyless, exhausting effort.
When I read apteryx’s comment “The result for me has been a thoroughly unpleasant stretch of cogitus interruptus (”noise in my head” and difficulty concentrating pretty much from waking up until falling asleep),” I wondered if it were actually the multiple topics he was working on at the time or the thoughts of worry, self-doubt, and editorial criticsm that made up the tortured, silent-scream “noise in [his] head.”
I’m currently completing a book which allows its users to differentiate between the thinking that serves us and that which can destroy us: 53 GAMES FOR THE MIND THAT WON’T SHUT THE $%&* UP! I once heard that a writer was advised to “write the book you need to read,” and this is exactly what 53 GAMES is for me. Even though I was able to strive my way to a magna cum laude graduation, my college lives (begun half a dozen times) would surely have been well-served by my knowing how to quell the near incessant shrieking, along with my relationships with professors and peers, and with my own long-suffering student self.
My companion’s son will be attending college next fall — I’m definitely going to send him your site’s link.
Cheerfully, A.T. Lynne
January 16th, 2009 at 2:39 am
I love it. In the past, I used to find it difficult to give up something, even I know that is not useful for me, and I might need some change, because I care very much how people look at me. But now I don’t have to because it’s all my work.
I will make it impressive in a large scale, and to do so, I am ready to give up some very miserable things no matter how the others look at me.
I will love yours,
Regards.
January 19th, 2009 at 5:24 am
@A.T. Lynne:
If you’d like a beta-tester for your book, send me an email!
It’s in the link from my name.
I think the noise in my head is mostly from too many things to think about. Worry and anger join in and make it worse, but I think those are “secondary complications”.
Here’s an example. Last week in one class, I had a really cool but difficult assignment–to complete in two days. I already had a lot of noise in my head from having just come from a class in real analysis. But, the percolation on this new assignment got going–adding to the din, causing something like physical agony. Within an hour, a vague idea came. Sitting at my computer that evening, though, I couldn’t write anything. Too much of a flood, not able to bring anything into focus. Every other thing I’m on is also jumping to mind: oh, I should email the grader; oh, I should run the dishwasher; oh, here’s an idea for how to make this other project fit the definition of machine learning; oh, I never understood the definition of this one operator and should ask about that; oh, damn, I still haven’t finished my taxes; etc. It took me about three days to actually run the dishwasher, because each time I walked to the kitchen, I remembered something else and got distracted. Much of the time, when the noise is at its most intense, it’s no longer any specific thought coming up and interrupting; it’s just a general roar of the ocean, unable to settle down into an articulable thought. Sometimes, after an hour or two sitting at the computer or with a notebook, I’ve settled down enough to actually do something tangible. Daytime spoils that because scheduled classes interrupt the “settling down”. So, work that requires concentration (almost all schoolwork) has to wait until evening. My evenings last week were useless–just lying down and waiting for the noise to die down.
Under normal circumstances, like a job (where there is only one thing to do), I would love a two-day challenge like that. I thrive on that sort of fast, intense creativity. In grad school, though, I’ve got four irons in the fire, and it’s driving me insane. (Taking three classes and teaching one is considered a moderate load. It’s the minimum allowed to be eligible for funding.)
What I’m experiencing must be commonplace. It would certainly explain all those cartoons about miserable grad students who learn to hate the subjects they once loved. A cure would make life enormously better for a great many people!
January 19th, 2009 at 5:28 am
There’s a bug in the URL thing. If you want my email, try the link from my name on this message.
January 27th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
What type of breaks do you take during these 8 hours?
January 28th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
I don’t have some organized system. A lot of days I work in a run. There’s always lunch. In the afternoon I’ll usually go for a walk for a snack. Beyond that, it’s mainly just work. The fixed-schedule focuses me.
January 29th, 2009 at 12:13 am
So you don’t take the 10 min break every hour?
March 1st, 2009 at 8:20 pm
[…] a graduate seminar that assigns demanding articles of demanding length. Being somewhat busy, as I’ve mentioned before, I’ve recently been working to squeeze every last ounce of speed out of my note-taking […]
March 12th, 2009 at 4:09 pm
social development…
Exactly! We need to start a group on Facebook for that….
March 12th, 2009 at 9:07 pm
[…] output doesn’t increase much. With this in mind, you might as well fix a regular work day (I do 9 to 5:30) and refuse to work beyond these hours (with the obvious exceptions: the night before deadlines, […]
March 27th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
[…] works very well within a system of fixed schedule productivity as described by Cal Newport. I would also recommend that you use a method like time mapping to […]
April 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
@ apteryx:
What you describe sounds a lot like ADD. I suffered similarly, trying one new “system” after another w/o success, until I finally saw a psych, got diagnosed, & got RX for 1 time-release stimulant pill every morning. The noise is gone; now I can simply take on the challenge of multi-tasking like a “normal” person, w/o the struggle to settle my mind into a productive mode. [& btw, most jobs don’t let you concentrate on one thing at a time; they offer the same grad-student-style multi-task overload, w/ possibly even more pressure from anger/worry.]
May 13th, 2009 at 8:02 pm
[…] this year, I made an important improvement to my infamous 9 to 5 student work day. Instead of treating these hours as one undifferentiated mass, I added the following simple […]